Creating file of cases to consider

cases.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# Cases to Consider
+1. Philpot Cases (Ongoing cases about enforcing Creative Commons BY based on Wikipedia Photos. Mostly about attribution and copyright management information)
+    1. Philpot v. Planck, LLC, Docket No. 1:17-cv-04513 (S.D.N.Y. Jun 15, 2017)
+    1. Philpot v. Entravision Communications Corporation, Docket No. 4:18-cv-07255 (N.D. Cal. Nov.
+20, 2018)
+    1. Philpot v. Hubbard Radio Phoenix LLC, Docket No. 2:18-cv-03084 (D. Ariz. Oct 01, 2018)
+    1. Philpot v. New Orleans Tourism Marketing Corporation, Docket No. 2:18-cv-09087 (E.D. La Oct
+1, 2018)
+1. Drauglis v. Kappa Map Grp., LLC, 128 F. Supp. 3d 46, 2015 ILRC 2503 (D.D.C. 2015) 
+    1. Derivate work of a photo used in the cover of a atlas
+    1. Location of attribution requirements under CC BY-SA 2.0
+    1. Court talks about license is one of "first impression" in the circuit
+1. Blizzard Entm’t, Inc. v. Lilith Games (Shanghai) Co., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74639 (N.D. Cal. May 16, 2017)
+    1. What is a work?
+1. Artifex Software, Inc. v. Hancom, Inc., No. 16-cv-06982-JSC, 2017 BL 136537 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2017)
+    1. GPL enforceable as a contract even without a signature.
+1. XimpleWare, Inc. v. Versata Software, Inc., Docket No. 5:13-cv-05161 (N.D. Cal. Nov 5, 2013), Document 85
+    1. Express patent license in GPL v2.0
+1. Oracle Am., Inc. v. Google LLC, 886 F.3d 1179, 1203–04 (Fed. Cir. 2018)
+    1. Good faith/industrary custom has limited help in a copyright infrigment/fair use defense.
+    1. Industrary custom is treated differently in a contract case vs a copyright infringement case
+1. Motion to File Amicus Curiae Brief, Great Minds v. FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc., Case No. 17-808 (2d Cir. July 5, 2017) , Document 40
+    1. 2nd circuit denied Creative Commons motion to file amicus brief to provide "unique, if not definitive, perspective on the operation of the license and its term"
+    1. License stewards view of hte license meaning may not be as meaningful as we expect when we get to court.
+1. Wallace v. IBM Corp., 467 F.3d 1104 (7th Cir. 2006) (Judge Easterbrook) (pro se case, but about anti-trust)
+1. Versata Software, Inc. v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (1:14-cv-00221)
+    1. GPL contract claim is not preempted by copyright
+    1. GPL might be enforceable by third party beneficiaries. (Need to get copies of the state court pleadings. How did the TX case turn out?)
+    1. If looks like Versata has a whole series of ligitation going on that might be related.
+1. XimpleWare, Inc. v. Versata Software, Inc., Docket No. 5:13-cv-05161 (N.D. Cal. Nov 5, 2013), Document 85
+    1. Distribution under GPL