Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove CSV Reporter on V2 Branch #500

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: v2
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

EricWF
Copy link
Contributor

@EricWF EricWF commented Dec 14, 2017

This patch removes the CSV Reporter entirely from the V2 branch.

This change is needed to support the work of converting to JSON.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 86.285% when pulling b01b035 on efcs:v2-remove-csv into 3d8dbc6 on google:v2.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 86.285% when pulling 19c41a3 on efcs:v2-remove-csv into 3d8dbc6 on google:v2.

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

Build benchmark 897 completed (commit 9b08350231 by @EricWF)

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

Build benchmark 905 completed (commit 0bff9681ff by @EricWF)

@dmah42
Copy link
Member

dmah42 commented Dec 14, 2017

LGTM

@dmah42
Copy link
Member

dmah42 commented May 29, 2018

handle conflicts and merge?

@KindDragon
Copy link
Contributor

Why you remove CSV support? CSV support really easy to open in LibreOffice Calc and build some charts

@dmah42
Copy link
Member

dmah42 commented Sep 4, 2018

@KindDragon We're removing support from the core library, but retaining JSON output. It is relatively to write an external tool to read the JSON and generate the CSV should it be necessary, but the library is getting very complicated with the various non-JSON reporters.

@KindDragon
Copy link
Contributor

It is relatively to write an external tool to read the JSON and generate the CSV should it be necessary,

Yes, but not as easy as it is now 😞

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants