docs: fix typos in some files

[Edge-Seven]

Contribution by Gittensor, learn more at https://gittensor.io/

[google-cla]

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Edge-Seven, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving code quality and readability by addressing several minor typographical errors across various files. The changes are purely cosmetic, ensuring consistency and correctness in comments, docstrings, and string literals, without altering any functional logic.

Highlights

• Typo Fix in adk_web_server.py: Corrected 'reenable' to 're-enable' in a TODO comment related to metrics.
• Typo Fix in connections_client.py: Changed 'incase' to 'in case' within a description string for a host name.
• Typo Fix in test_response_evaluator.py: Updated a test function's docstring, correcting 'Rouge metric' to 'Rogue metric'.
• Typo Fix in test_litellm.py: Corrected 'Licens' to 'License' in the file's license header comment.
• Typo Fix in test_bigquery_query_tool.py: Fixed 'successfull' to 'successful' in a test comment.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[adk-bot]

Response from ADK Triaging Agent

Hello @Edge-Seven, thank you for your contribution!

It looks like the Contributor License Agreement (CLA) check has failed. Before we can merge this pull request, you'll need to sign the CLA. You can find more information and sign the agreement here: https://cla.developers.google.com/

Thank you!

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix typos across several files. While most of the fixes are correct, one change incorrectly alters 'Rouge' to 'Rogue' in a test file, which is a factual error for the ROUGE evaluation metric. Additionally, in another file, a line with two typos was only partially corrected, leaving one typo behind. I've provided suggestions to address both of these issues.

[gemini-code-assist]

This change appears to introduce an error. The metric is 'ROUGE' (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation), not 'Rogue'. The original 'Rouge' was correct. Please revert this change.

Suggested change

	"""Test evaluate_invocations function for Rogue metric."""
	"""Test evaluate_invocations function for Rouge metric."""

[gemini-code-assist]

While you've corrected 'successfull' to 'successful', there's another typo in this line. 'executeion' should be 'execution'.

Suggested change

	# Test successful executeion of the tool
	# Test successful execution of the tool