-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move some Actions related functions from routers
to services
#33280
Merged
wxiaoguang
merged 11 commits into
go-gitea:main
from
Zettat123:improve-actions-gitcontext
Jan 15, 2025
Merged
Move some Actions related functions from routers
to services
#33280
wxiaoguang
merged 11 commits into
go-gitea:main
from
Zettat123:improve-actions-gitcontext
Jan 15, 2025
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GiteaBot
added
the
lgtm/need 2
This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging.
label
Jan 15, 2025
pull-request-size
bot
added
the
size/L
Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
label
Jan 15, 2025
github-actions
bot
added
modifies/api
This PR adds API routes or modifies them
modifies/go
Pull requests that update Go code
labels
Jan 15, 2025
wxiaoguang
reviewed
Jan 15, 2025
lunny
reviewed
Jan 15, 2025
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <[email protected]>
lunny
reviewed
Jan 15, 2025
lunny
reviewed
Jan 15, 2025
lunny
reviewed
Jan 15, 2025
lunny
reviewed
Jan 15, 2025
lunny
reviewed
Jan 15, 2025
Can we have a test for GenerateGiteaContext |
Add a test in fdae294 |
lunny
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2025
GiteaBot
added
lgtm/need 1
This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged.
and removed
lgtm/need 2
This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging.
labels
Jan 15, 2025
wxiaoguang
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2025
GiteaBot
added
lgtm/done
This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore.
and removed
lgtm/need 1
This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged.
labels
Jan 15, 2025
zjjhot
added a commit
to zjjhot/gitea
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2025
* giteaofficial/main: Only allow admins to rename default/protected branches (go-gitea#33276) Enable Typescript `noImplicitThis` (go-gitea#33250) Prepare for support performance trace (go-gitea#33286) Fix closed dependency title (go-gitea#33285) Move some Actions related functions from `routers` to `services` (go-gitea#33280) Fix incorrect TagName/BranchName usages (go-gitea#33279)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm/done
This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore.
modifies/api
This PR adds API routes or modifies them
modifies/go
Pull requests that update Go code
size/L
Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Move the main logic of
generateTaskContext
andfindTaskNeeds
to theservices
layer.This is a part of #32751, since we need the git context and
needs
to parse the concurrency expressions.