fix: Handling Dangling Commas in delete_hanging_comma Function
#417
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes primarily enhance the control flow of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Code as delete_hanging_comma
participant Test as test_delete_hanging_comma
Test ->> Code: Call `delete_hanging_comma`
Note over Code: Update `next_comma` before loop
Code ->> Code: Process input, removing dangling comma if present
Code -->> Test: Return processed result
Test ->> Test: Validate result against expected output
Assessment against linked issues
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
1 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
crates/core/src/inline_snippets.rs (3)
Line range hint
9-39: Functionality offilter_out_nestedlooks correct but can be optimized.The nested loop can be optimized to reduce time complexity.
Consider using a more efficient data structure or algorithm to reduce the time complexity of the nested loop.
Line range hint
40-60: Functionality ofsort_range_startlooks correct but can be optimized.The sorting mechanism can potentially be optimized for performance.
Consider using a more efficient sorting algorithm if performance is a concern.
Line range hint
93-205: Functionality ofinline_sorted_snippets_with_offsetlooks correct but can be optimized.There are several nested loops and checks that can potentially be optimized for performance.
Consider refactoring to reduce the complexity and improve performance.
|
@morgante This is a fix I am considering after analyzing the delete_hanging_comma function to handle dangling commas perfectly. Please review it. If any changes or improvements needed, I am happy to incorporate them |
|
@varshith257 I would be very surprised if this is sufficient to fix the issue. Please make sure you have added the test case from the issue and make sure all existing tests continue to pass as well. |
|
Yes, I think we need a test case better to test these changes. Will add it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
1 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings
| | name="TestTask", | ||
| | description="This is a test task.", | ||
| | type="TestType", | ||
| | , |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This isn't a representative test. We specifically want to test cases where an argument is removed, and therefore the trailing comma after it is also removed.
/claim #416
fixes #416
Before the Change:
The function iterated through characters in the
codestring, checking and potentially skipping characters marked for deletionto_delete. This needed adjustment to handle dangling commas correctly.After the Change:
to_delete, ensuring they are not included in the finalresultstring.Greptile Summary
This is an auto-generated summary
delete_hanging_commafunction to correctly skip dangling commasnext_comma = to_delete.next();to the appropriate position within the loopSummary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests