Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: test match only with filenames #165

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

feat: test match only with filenames #165

merged 6 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

seren5240
Copy link
Contributor

@seren5240 seren5240 commented Apr 5, 2024

Extend distinguishing match only from no result outcomes for samples with file names or multiple files.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced grit.yaml for specifying rules to rewrite filenames in Markdown files.
  • Tests
    • Added new tests for validating filename rewriting patterns.
    • Removed an outdated test function.
  • Refactor
    • Updated test functionality to better handle multifile samples.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update introduces a new YAML file for versioning and filename rewriting rules, enhances testing with new functions for pattern specificity, and streamlines functionality by removing redundant tests and improving multifile sample detection. This cohesive set of changes aims to refine the project's capability to handle and test filename patterns more effectively.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../.grit/grit.yaml Introduced grit.yaml with version 0.0.1 and filename rewriting rules.
.../tests/patterns_test.rs Added tests for non-matching YAML and filename-specific pattern matching.
.../tests/plumbing.rs Removed a redundant test function for non-matching YAML samples.
.../gritmodule/src/testing.rs Updated to use is_multifile_sample function for better multifile sample detection.

🐇✨
In the burrow, deep and wide,
New rules and tests side by side.
With each change, we hop with pride,
Through code and docs, our strides collide.
For better code, our paths are tied.
🌟📜🛠️

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@seren5240 seren5240 marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2024 19:51
@seren5240 seren5240 requested a review from a team April 5, 2024 19:51
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e311c2a and ee0ab2b.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • crates/cli_bin/fixtures/match_filename/.grit/grit.yaml (1 hunks)
  • crates/cli_bin/tests/patterns_test.rs (1 hunks)
  • crates/cli_bin/tests/plumbing.rs (1 hunks)
  • crates/gritmodule/src/testing.rs (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • crates/cli_bin/tests/plumbing.rs
Additional comments not posted (5)
crates/cli_bin/fixtures/match_filename/.grit/grit.yaml (1)

1-23: The changes in grit.yaml align with the PR's objectives to enhance file handling by introducing a new pattern for rewriting filenames. Ensure the pattern logic and samples accurately reflect the intended behavior and effectively test the new feature.

crates/cli_bin/tests/patterns_test.rs (2)

251-265: The test function checks_non_matching_yaml_sample correctly validates the handling of non-matching YAML samples. Consider adding more detailed assertions to ensure the test's effectiveness in verifying the expected behavior.


268-282: The test function tests_match_only_with_file_name effectively validates the system's ability to handle patterns that match only with file names. Ensure comprehensive coverage of scenarios involving file name matches to fully validate the new feature's functionality.

crates/gritmodule/src/testing.rs (2)

223-229: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [226-242]

The updates to test_pattern_sample correctly incorporate checks for multifile samples, enhancing the system's ability to process such samples accurately. Consider adding comments to clarify the logic for handling multifile samples, especially in scenarios involving output mismatches and expected outputs.


332-334: The introduction of is_multifile_sample effectively enables the system to identify multifile samples based on input content. Ensure that all relevant scenarios involving multifile samples are covered by this check to fully support the new feature's functionality.

@seren5240 seren5240 merged commit 4bd4ee7 into main Apr 5, 2024
8 checks passed
@seren5240 seren5240 deleted the file-equal branch April 5, 2024 19:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants