Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: test stdlib #130

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024
Merged

chore: test stdlib #130

merged 8 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

ilevyor
Copy link
Contributor

@ilevyor ilevyor commented Apr 1, 2024

fixes: #127
and: #107

add ci that ensures the standard library is tested against new changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Implemented a new CI job to ensure the standard library is thoroughly tested.
    • Updated the main.yaml workflow file to include a job for testing the standard library.
    • Concealed internal details for enhanced confidentiality.
    • Added a new job to test the standard library.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update introduces a new job named test-stdlib in the CI pipeline to ensure the integrity of the standard library. This job encompasses a series of steps including cloning code, setting up environments for Rust, JavaScript (with Ruff), and Go, and finally executing grit patterns test to validate the standard library against potential breaking changes. This addition aims to safeguard the codebase by preemptively catching issues that could disrupt the standard library's functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/main.yaml Added test-stdlib job to test the standard library

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add the standard library to CI (#127)

Poem

🐇 In the world of code, a rabbit hopped,
Adding tests, so errors stopped.
🌟 With a leap and a bound,
Grit's standard library, now sound.
In CI's flow, it did embed,
Ensuring patterns, ahead we tread.
📚 A tale of tests, so bright and new,
A rabbit's work, through and through.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 43b48f8 and 5283f58.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yaml (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/main.yaml (1)

102-140: The test-stdlib job is well-structured and follows a logical sequence of steps to ensure the standard library is tested thoroughly. However, there are a few points to consider for improvement:

  1. Consistency in Action Versions: The job uses actions/checkout@v3 for cloning the main codebase and actions/checkout@v4 for checking out the JavaScript repository. It's generally a good practice to use the same version of actions across the workflow unless there's a specific reason for the discrepancy. If v4 offers improvements or features needed for checking out the JavaScript repository, consider upgrading the first checkout step to v4 as well.

  2. Rust Toolchain Version: The job specifies a nightly Rust toolchain version (nightly-2023-11-16). While using a nightly version might be necessary for certain features, it's important to document the reasons for this choice, especially if specific nightly features are being utilized. This ensures maintainability and makes it easier for new contributors to understand the decision.

  3. Go Version Specification: The Go version is specified with a caret (^1.22.0), which allows for minor version updates. While this is generally safe, it's important to ensure that the project's Go code is compatible with potential minor version updates. Automated tests or a manual review process should be in place to catch any compatibility issues.

  4. Security Considerations: The workflow runs scripts and installs dependencies from external sources (e.g., Rust toolchain, Ruff, Go setup). Ensure that these sources are trusted and consider pinning dependencies to specific versions to avoid potential malicious updates.

  5. Documentation: Adding comments to the workflow file explaining the purpose of each step, especially for steps involving external repositories or tools not commonly associated with Rust or Go projects, would improve the maintainability and understandability of the workflow.

.github/workflows/main.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@morgante morgante left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not ready for you. Don't leave all this commented out code.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5283f58 and 4ad4fbd.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yaml (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yaml
Additional Context Used

@ilevyor ilevyor marked this pull request as draft April 1, 2024 21:07
@ilevyor ilevyor marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2024 16:13
@ilevyor ilevyor requested review from morgante and a team April 2, 2024 16:13
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ad4fbd and 3b71e4b.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yaml

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b71e4b and 46aee8f.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yaml

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 46aee8f and 40a5781.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yaml

@ilevyor ilevyor merged commit 0100191 into main Apr 2, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add the standard library to CI
2 participants