-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix docker nightly build #2643
base: gz-sim9
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix docker nightly build #2643
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Maksim Derbasov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maksim Derbasov <[email protected]>
Would it additionally make sense to introduce a CI job to make sure that this docker file can build on, for instance, a nightly basis? |
Not a big master of GitHub actions, could try I suppose |
Maybe in another PR? It not fits very well widely spread pipelines AFAIS. Actually I planned to make fix for annoying bug #2506 which affects us. (and we use older version in which I'd like to propagate fix too). |
Absolutely, would just be a nice addition to keep these dockerfiles fresh and not regressing.
Good with me. |
Ok. The last mystery, what happened in Jenkins. Looks like something goes wrong with couple of python tests. I can't try restart build there, don't have a permissions. |
the failing python tests are likely due to osrf/homebrew-simulation#2834 which is currently affecting all gz packages. So not the fault of this PR |
Thank you for your explanation. What is the next step for this PR? |
yeah, once this is merged, you can cherry pick the changes for backports or use mergify, e.g. add the comment |
Ok, will try) Thank you! |
Signed-off-by: Maksim Derbasov <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the changes. I have a few more comments.
docker/README.md
Outdated
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ distribution using debians. | |||
image of Gazebo Garden: | |||
|
|||
``` | |||
./build.bash gz ./Dockerfile.gz | |||
./build.bash gz-ionic ./Dockerfile.gz |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, but now we need to update the instruction right above to say "Gazebo Ionic"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll roll-back it here to garden and lines below too, due to build.bash
not working properly with Ionic AFAIU. It executes Dockerfile.gz
, which is based on nvidia/opengl:1.2-glvnd-devel-ubuntu20.04
image.
Signed-off-by: Maksim Derbasov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maksim Derbasov <[email protected]>
Added, thanks to @skorobogatydmitry for help |
Folks, can we wrap-up this PR? This PR fixes nightly docker build, which seems almost nobody using. |
|
||
sudo apt-get install --no-install-recommends -y \ | ||
libbenchmark-dev \ | ||
libbenchmark1 | ||
libbenchmark1.8.3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can get rid of libbenchmark1.8.3
. It should be automatically installed with libbenchmark-dev
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this entire libbenchmark dependency is redundant, It's compiling fine even w/o this installation.
But as I said earlier, initial idea was to keep this PR as same as possible with previous implementation.
I'd like to remove it completely, if no objections
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
libbenchmark
is an optional dependency. There are tests that use it, but they're disabled if libbenchmark
is not installed
gz-sim/test/benchmark/CMakeLists.txt
Line 4 in c298007
if (GzBenchmark_FOUND) |
So I think we should keep it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reverted, commend added
Signed-off-by: Maksim Derbasov <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## gz-sim9 #2643 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage ? 68.80%
==========================================
Files ? 341
Lines ? 33087
Branches ? 0
==========================================
Hits ? 22765
Misses ? 10322
Partials ? 0 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Signed-off-by: Maksim Derbasov <[email protected]>
@mjcarroll @azeey Can we get this merged? The user has already bumped us twice and has been waiting patiently. The only thing missing AFAICT is approval from @mjcarroll. |
🦟 Bug fix
Fixes #
Summary
Clean build by instruction in
docker/README.md
not working. Base image builds fine, but the next step is failing.Ubuntu Focal (20.04) is too old to build
gz-sim9
branch. It doesn't contain required GZ packages.GCC8 is a very old compiler, I believe installation and replacing a default compiler was done for Ubuntu 18 (with default GCC7). Switched to GCC11 (default for Ubuntu 22). IMHO I'd prefer not to bind to compiler version in this case, but I made it as close as possible
Minor improvements in Readme and image
AFAIU
docker/run.bash
script not working well on modern systems, but it's out of scope of this questionSlightly out of scope, but couple of months ago tried same for a
gz-sim8
branch and had problem with 2 missing gz libraries. If this patch will be accepted, I'll do similar changes on that branch tooChecklist
codecheck
passed (See contributing)Note to maintainers: Remember to use Squash-Merge and edit the commit message to match the pull request summary while retaining
Signed-off-by
messages.