Fix ci e2e error

[Sway007]

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

• The commit message follows our guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

Other information:

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated import paths from @galacean/engine-shader-lab to @galacean/engine-shaderlab across multiple files
  • Standardized code formatting by converting single quotes to double quotes in various example and test files

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request involves updating import paths for the ShaderLab module across multiple files from @galacean/engine-shader-lab to @galacean/engine-shaderlab. The changes primarily affect end-to-end test cases and example files, focusing on standardizing import statements and string formatting. No functional changes to the code logic were made, with modifications limited to import paths and quotation mark styles.

Changes

File	Change Summary
e2e/case/material-shaderLab.ts	Updated ShaderLab import path
e2e/case/project-loader.ts	Updated ShaderLab import path and standardized code formatting
e2e/case/shaderLab-mrt.ts	Updated ShaderLab import path
e2e/case/shaderLab-renderState.ts	Updated ShaderLab import path
examples/buffer-mesh-particle-shader-effect.ts	Converted string literals to double quotes
examples/shader-lab-multi-pass.ts	Updated ShaderLab import path
examples/shader-lab-simple.ts	Updated import statements and standardized quotes
examples/shader-lab.ts	Converted string literals to double quotes
examples/shader-water.ts	Converted string literals to double quotes

Possibly related PRs

• Improve ShaderLab compilation error log and package build #2364: Changes to ShaderLab import path
• Enhance ShaderLab documents #2331: Updates to ShaderLab import path
• Fix typo of HOW_TO_CONTRIBUTE.md #2400: Modifications to ShaderLab import path
• Rename package name fo engine-shader-lab to engine-shaderlab #2484: Package renaming from engine-shader-lab to engine-shaderlab

Suggested labels

bug, engineering, compatibility risk

Suggested reviewers

• GuoLei1990
• zhuxudong

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through the code we go,
Imports dancing, paths in a row,
ShaderLab's journey, smooth and bright,
Quotes aligned, everything's just right!
A rabbit's refactor, clean and neat! 🌈

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f55f83e and 3ec3b99.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)

• e2e/case/material-shaderLab.ts (1 hunks)
• e2e/case/project-loader.ts (1 hunks)
• e2e/case/shaderLab-mrt.ts (1 hunks)
• e2e/case/shaderLab-renderState.ts (1 hunks)
• examples/buffer-mesh-particle-shader-effect.ts (3 hunks)
• examples/shader-lab-multi-pass.ts (1 hunks)
• examples/shader-lab-simple.ts (3 hunks)
• examples/shader-lab.ts (3 hunks)
• examples/shader-water.ts (5 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)

• e2e/case/shaderLab-mrt.ts
• e2e/case/shaderLab-renderState.ts
• e2e/case/material-shaderLab.ts
• examples/shader-lab-multi-pass.ts
• e2e/case/project-loader.ts
• examples/shader-lab.ts
• examples/shader-lab-simple.ts
• examples/shader-water.ts
• examples/buffer-mesh-particle-shader-effect.ts

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)

• GitHub Check: e2e (22.x)
• GitHub Check: codecov

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 91 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.45%. Comparing base (f55f83e) to head (3ec3b99).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev/1.4.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
examples/shader-water.ts	0.00%	29 Missing ⚠️
examples/buffer-mesh-particle-shader-effect.ts	0.00%	19 Missing ⚠️
examples/shader-lab-simple.ts	0.00%	15 Missing ⚠️
examples/shader-lab.ts	0.00%	15 Missing ⚠️
e2e/case/project-loader.ts	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️
e2e/case/material-shaderLab.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
e2e/case/shaderLab-mrt.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
e2e/case/shaderLab-renderState.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
examples/shader-lab-multi-pass.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           dev/1.4    #2492      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    68.42%   68.45%   +0.03%     
===========================================
  Files          923      923              
  Lines        96007    95994      -13     
  Branches      8141     8140       -1     
===========================================
+ Hits         65691    65712      +21     
+ Misses       30062    30028      -34     
  Partials       254      254              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	68.45% <0.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.