-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: clearer error message when function signature does not contain parentheses #9478
Open
yipu3
wants to merge
2
commits into
foundry-rs:master
Choose a base branch
from
yipu3:yipu3/clearer-error
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't make sense to include it in this error message to be honest
Should rather be different message or fall-through condition in this else block, not part of this error for handling missing Etherscan API key (which is valid on its own)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe when the signature does not contain parentheses the code try to treat the string as the function name and want to fetch the signature from Etherscan?
I think this message can help users that wrongly omit parentheses solve the problem faster without misleading info.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think there is actually a problem with omitting parentheses here
You are having this issue because you need to pass an Etherscan API key and RPC URL.
The function
deposit
is also not a method on the Uniswap V2 Router but rather on WETH.yield the same result
0x
, which is expectedyields:
0x5C69bEe701ef814a2B6a3EDD4B1652CB9cc5aA6f
whereas
yields:
0x0000000000000000000000005c69bee701ef814a2b6a3edd4b1652cb9cc5aa6f
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess it could be explained further that
factory()
is providing the full signature, whilefactory
without parens is requesting a function calledfactory
which can only be retrieved from an outside sourceThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My issue is when I wrongly omit the parentheses, the printed error message does not direct me to fix the problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yipu3 per comments above, we discussed a better UX would be to warn that the function will be retrieved from outside source, do you want to update the PR to reflect this? thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok thanks. I will update.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about this:
Function is pure name. The signature will be retrieved from outside source, please provide an Etherscan API key.
Any suggestion?