Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add template for smart contract deployment and interaction #15

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

codeesura
Copy link

This PR standardizes the crate name for generated contract bindings to bindings. Previously, building the project could produce a different crate name, forcing changes in workspace dependencies and imports. Now, using bindings ensures stable references (e.g., use bindings::...) and prevents the need to update workspace configurations after each build.

@codeesura
Copy link
Author

Also consider adjusting the Makefile to produce a foundry-contracts crate instead of bindings. This would provide a more descriptive name and make it even clearer that the crate contains contract-related code

@codeesura codeesura changed the title chore: unify crate naming convention for contract bindings feat: add template for smart contract deployment and interaction Dec 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant