UIREQ-1188 - Add optional column 'Retrieval service point'

[Terala-Priyanka]

Purpose

UIREQ-1188 - Add "Retrieval service point" column in Request app

Approach

Add optional column 'Retrieval service point' which is unchecked by default in 'show columns list. This column is sortable as well.
Maximum coverage is achieved.

Screenshots

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

• I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
• Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
  • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
  • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
  • There are no major code smells or security issues
• Does this introduce breaking changes?
  • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
  • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

• What other modules will these changes impact?
• Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
  • If not, please create them
  • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
  • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
• Are the JIRAs under active development?
  • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
• Do PRs exist for these changes?
  • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

[github-actions]

Jest Unit Test Statistics

       1 files  ±0       62 suites  ±0   1m 36s ⏱️ -4s
   798 tests +1     798 ✔️ +1  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 107 runs  +1  1 107 ✔️ +1  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 959c9ab. ± Comparison against base commit f9ea4b9.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
75.0% Coverage on New Code
50.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud