Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIQM-743: Prevent handleSubmit from running if there is any validation issue, instead of using the complete form API. #770

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Dmytro-Melnyshyn
Copy link
Contributor

@Dmytro-Melnyshyn Dmytro-Melnyshyn commented Dec 27, 2024

Purpose

Be able to see a modal window after canceling a record, if there are changes in it.

Issues

UIQM-743

Approach

Prevent handleSubmit from running once there is any validation issue instead of using the complete form API, since the form sets submitSucceeded to true and that flag is responsible for showing the confirmation modal. This also removes duplication.

Screencasts

2024-12-27_17h43_16.mp4

TODOS and Open Questions

Learning

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

…ion issue, instead of using the 'complete' form API.
@Dmytro-Melnyshyn Dmytro-Melnyshyn requested a review from a team December 27, 2024 15:45
Copy link

Jest Unit Test Results

  1 files  ±0   45 suites  ±0   2m 39s ⏱️ -1s
481 tests  - 2  481 ✅  - 2  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
484 runs   - 2  484 ✅  - 2  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 2a87eba. ± Comparison against base commit 93f9961.

This pull request removes 3 and adds 1 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
useSaveRecord when creating when there is a validation error should stop submitting ‑ useSaveRecord when creating when there is a validation error should stop submitting
useSaveRecord when deriving when there is a validation error should stop submitting ‑ useSaveRecord when deriving when there is a validation error should stop submitting
useSaveRecord when editing when there is a validation error should stop submitting ‑ useSaveRecord when editing when there is a validation error should stop submitting
Given QuickMarcEditor when saving form with validation issue should prevent submitting ‑ Given QuickMarcEditor when saving form with validation issue should prevent submitting

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant