[UICAL-269] Migrate from self-contained typings to stripes-types (again)

[ncovercash]

Jira UICAL-269

redo of #506

Purpose

Initially, we developed our own typings for the Stripes framework, to be used internally by ui-calendar. This was great when we were the only TypeScript module in the FOLIO ecosystem, however, that is no longer the case, and it does not make sense for ui-calendar to be the source of truth for Stripes typings.

Approach

Types were moved to https://github.com/folio-org/stripes-types (over the past many months), where they can be contributed to and shared by all FOLIO developers.

Now that this central location exists, there's no reason for ui-calendar to contain the old types; in fact, they often caused conflicts when attempting to build a platform.

Note

This broke the build on the first attempt, due to what appeared to be a type error in ui-calendar. This, however, was hiding the real issue — ui-bulk-edit contained old types which had some incorrect and missing information. Once folio-org/ui-bulk-edit#440 is merged, this issue will be resolved.

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

• I've added an appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
• Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
  • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
  • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
  • There are no major code smells or security issues
• Does this introduce breaking changes?
  • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly N/A
  • There are no breaking changes in this PR.
    • We could consider this a breaking change, however, these types were never intended to be used externally and therefore were not a public interface.

[github-actions]

Jest Unit Test Statistics

    1 files  ±0    71 suites  ±0   2m 44s ⏱️ -8s
327 tests ±0  326 ✔️ ±0  1 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
354 runs  ±0  353 ✔️ ±0  1 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 8dd4cc3. ± Comparison against base commit ca090c8.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
86.2% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud