Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Corrected Repetition in Contracts Section Update README.md #448

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mdqst
Copy link

@mdqst mdqst commented Dec 23, 2024

Motivation

While reviewing the documentation, I noticed an unnecessary repetition of the word "contracts" in the following sentence:

"The [v3.1 contracts](https://github.com/farcasterxyz/contracts/releases/tag/v3.1.0) contracts were reviewed by [0xMacro](https://0xmacro.com/) and [Cyfrin](https://www.cyfrin.io/)."

I have updated the sentence to eliminate the redundancy, so it now reads:

"The [v3.1 contracts](https://github.com/farcasterxyz/contracts/releases/tag/v3.1.0) were reviewed by [0xMacro](https://0xmacro.com/) and [Cyfrin](https://www.cyfrin.io/)."

Thanks for considering this update!

Merge Checklist

Choose all relevant options below by adding an x now or at any time before submitting for review


PR-Codex overview

This PR focuses on refining the language in the README.md file regarding the audits of the v3.1 and v3.0 contracts. It removes redundant wording for clarity.

Detailed summary

  • Changed "contracts were reviewed by" to "were reviewed by" for v3.1 contracts.
  • Changed "contracts were reviewed by" to "were reviewed by" for v3.0 contracts.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

@mdqst mdqst closed this by deleting the head repository Jan 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant