Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

misc: Add macros for Velox::Expected #11570

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

marin-ma
Copy link
Contributor

Add macros VELOX_RETURN_UNEXPECTED_IF, VELOX_RETURN_UNEXPECTED_NOT_OK and VELOX_RETURN_UNEXPECTED.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Nov 18, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Deploy Preview for meta-velox ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2a84cb9
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/meta-velox/deploys/673c1db0267dce0008afab9d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-11570--meta-velox.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@marin-ma marin-ma changed the title Add macros for Velox::Expected misc: Add macros for Velox::Expected Nov 18, 2024
@marin-ma
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pedroerp Could you help to review? Thanks!

@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ Status returnNotOk(Status s) {
return Status::Invalid("invalid");
}

TEST(StatusTest, macros) {
TEST(StatusTest, stausMacros) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo stausMacros ->statusMacros

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants