Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin 6.5.0 -> 6.5.3 #13105

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

TheRealBenJones
Copy link

This bumps the version of fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin 6.5.0 -> 6.5.3 to resolve an outstanding issue seen here:
#13099

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

Hi @BCJonesey!

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community.

Action Required

In order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you.

Process

In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.

Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks!

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks!

@Npervic
Copy link

Npervic commented May 24, 2023

Hey Ben, any reason this is not merged and released yet? ETA?

@TheRealBenJones TheRealBenJones force-pushed the bump-fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin branch from 09f398a to f25182a Compare June 7, 2023 21:17
@TheRealBenJones
Copy link
Author

@Npervic unfortunately i don't have merge ability, I think it is just waiting on a maintainer to click the button

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants