Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: query stdout terminal size to see if the output gose to a tty. #438

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 2, 2023

Conversation

hehelego
Copy link
Contributor

@hehelego hehelego commented Sep 28, 2023

terminal_size::terminal_size() is used to determine if stdout is connected to a real tty/pty. In previous version of terminal-size, this method only queries the terminal size for stdout. However, it is changed in the following commit
eminence/terminal-size@08f0e73 Now the method will use stdout, stdin, stderr, trying its best to determine the terminal size. This cannot be used to determine if eza output is piped or redirected.
We should use terminal_size_using_fd on stdout.as_raw_fd instead.
This patch makes eza --color=auto behaves like ls --color=auto.

Resolves #434 Fixes #433

Also Resolves #441 as well.

`terminal_size::terminal_size()` is used to determine if stdout is
connected to a real tty/pty. In previous version of `terminal-size`,
this method only queries the terminal size for `stdout`.
However, it is changed in the following commit
eminence/terminal-size@08f0e73
Now the method will use `stdout, stdin, stderr`, trying its best to
determine the terminal size. This cannot be used to determine if `eza`
output is piped or redirected.
We should use `terminal_size_using_fd` on `stdout.as_raw_fd` instead.

Resolves eza-community#434 Fixes eza-community#433
@PThorpe92
Copy link
Member

This looks good, Thanks for the contribution!

I see that this causes some issues on Windows though, take a look at the test results and it shouldn't be too hard to set up a solution. If you don't have access to a windows machine, I can try to grab one from work tomorrow and figure it out.

@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

Member

Sorry, I don't have a machine with MS Windows installed. With that said, I can look into the document of terminal-size and try to fix them.

@PThorpe92
Copy link
Member

It looks like it even suggests a solution in the error output. No worries, I can get a windows box tomorrow and I'm sure it's just specifying a windows specific method. Shouldn't be too tricky.

The previous commit 427f975 uses
`terminal_size::terminal_size_using_fd` and `io::stdout().as_raw_fd()`
which are only available on unix platform, creating compatibility issue
for windows.
In this commit, I leverage rust conditional compilation and
`terminal_size::terminal_size_using_handle` to implement the same
functionality for windows platform.
We use functions in this crate to get stdout handler for
terminal size query.
@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

CI/CD tasks passed, but I am uncertain about whether this works on real windows machine.

Copy link
Member

@cafkafk cafkafk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code looks good to me, and testing seems to show it as working.

I'd prefer if we first got a windows user to test it out as well. Also, from #433 I got the impression that this wasn't documented that well, maybe it would be a good idea to update completions, man page, and readme to reflect this behavior.

Also, I'd like to pair this with a test case. I'm assuming something like testing eza --color=automatic --online > eza-out; cat ./eza-out (as mentioned in #433) and ensuring it doesn't change following this PR would be an option, but I wonder if you had more ideas.

@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @cafkafk , thanks for pointing out these needy updates. I didn't realize the need for including new testcases and improving documentation.
I'd like to contribute more code/docs and push this forward. I can help revise the man page / shell completion tomorrow.
However, I am unfamiliar with the way you do functionality-level testing (the things in tests/cmd/). I'll have to spend some time doing it.

@cafkafk
Copy link
Member

cafkafk commented Sep 28, 2023

Hi @cafkafk , thanks for pointing out these needy updates. I didn't realize the need for including new testcases and improving documentation. I'd like to contribute more code/docs and push this forward. I can help revise the man page / shell completion tomorrow. However, I am unfamiliar with the way you do functionality-level testing (the things in tests/cmd/). I'll have to spend some time doing it.

No worries, take as much time as you need! If you have any questions, feel free to ask here, or pop into the matrix chat.

@daviessm
Copy link
Contributor

@hehelego I'm just checking this out on Windows. As far as I can tell, redirecting to a file with and without --color=auto works as I'd expect. It also worked before though, were we expecting to see any difference on Windows? I may be looking at the wrong thing 😎

@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

hehelego commented Sep 28, 2023

@hehelego I'm just checking this out on Windows. As far as I can tell, redirecting to a file with and without --color=auto works as I'd expect. It also worked before though, were we expecting to see any difference on Windows? I may be looking at the wrong thing 😎

Hi @daviessm , thanks for testing it on Windows. I am not sure what is the behavior on windows before this patch. But as long as this patch works as expected, I think we are fine.

I spotted the unexpected behavior on Linux platform (see the related issue threads for details). I tried to correct the bug by query terminal_size_using_fd of stdout.as_raw_fd, however this dose not work for windows (they use handles instead of file descriptors). Later on, I tried to use terminal_size_using_handle on STD_OUTPUT_HANDLE, expecting that to work on windows.
We were waiting to test if that actually works on real Windows installation.

Copy link
Contributor

@daviessm daviessm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, looks like the original code always worked for Windows and this doesn't break it so LGTM for Windows 👍

@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

BTW, I fish shell has a special builtin function fish_update_completions which extracts completions from manpages.
If we are keeping the manpage exa(1) up to date, there is no need to keep a separated and synchronized fish completion

@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, looks like the original code always worked for Windows and this doesn't break it so LGTM for Windows 👍

Great. I'll keep working on manpages improvement and test case introduction.

@daviessm
Copy link
Contributor

BTW, I fish shell has a special builtin function fish_update_completions which extracts completions from manpages. If we are keeping the manpage exa(1) up to date, there is no need to keep a separated and synchronized fish completion

Yep, once the clap PR #197 gets merged we can autogenerate completions for multiple shells from that - see #400 (comment)

@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

hehelego commented Sep 28, 2023

I'll need some help. Looks like trycmd dose not support complicated CLI testing involving shell, redirection and pipeline.
We may need something like snapbox for that.

See assert-rs/snapbox#168 for related discussion. The OP switched to snapbox eventually.

@PThorpe92
Copy link
Member

Interesting, I've never heard of it. I'm going to turn this into a discussion post, and look into snapbox.

Feel free to come by the matrix channel if you want, we can see about how to proceed here particularly

@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wait, I think I've mis-read that issue. They actually build another testing framework based on snapbox.
I've just looked into the document of snapbox and seems no easy way to test IO redirecting and pipelining..
Sorry for that.

@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think we can move forward to merge this PR first. Finding a proper way to test eza's behavior when redirection and pipelining are involved should be a separate task.

@cfxegbert
Copy link
Contributor

Why not use the trait IsTerminal?

@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

Why not use the trait IsTerminal?

Thanks for pointing it our, exactly the thing we need.

Previsouly we tried to use `terminal_size_using_fd` on unix, and `terminal_size_using_handle` on windows to detect if stdout is connected to a terminal.
This can be done by using `std::io::IsTerminal` on `std::io::stdout`, eliminating the need of conditional compiling.
@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think we can move forward to merge this PR first. Finding a proper way to test eza's behavior when redirection and pipelining are involved should be a separate task.

Update: I've come up with a plan to test this using snapbox. I'll try to implement it soon.
We can merge this PR after the test are available.

@daviessm
Copy link
Contributor

I'll give the new code a whiz on Windows later today.

Copy link
Contributor

@daviessm daviessm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Windows still looks good

@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

hehelego commented Sep 29, 2023

Yep. I find another API misuse:

Self::Automatic => terminal_size::terminal_size().map(|(w, _)| w.0.into()),

The comment shows that we want only to query stdout, but that is not what terminal_size::terminal_size() does.

Another API misuse. `terminal_size::terminal_size()` now looks into `stdout`, `stderr` and `stdin` to determine the terminal size with best effort.
This is desirable for TUI applications, but not for CLI applications.
`eza` only cares about the size of the terminal which is connected to standard output.
We change this to `terminal_size_with_fd(stdout.as_raw_fd)` on unix, and `terminal_size_with_handle(STD_OUTPUT_HANDLE)` on windows.
@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

hehelego commented Sep 29, 2023

I cannot test this with std::process:Command or snapbox::cmd::Command. They use pipe to capture stdout of the spawned process. I have no way to get the "normal" output (when you directly run eza from a shell session).

You may try this code snippet:

    use std::io::Write;
    let out = std::process::Command::new("bash")
        .args(["-c", "/bin/ls --color=auto"])
        .output()
        .unwrap()
        .stdout;
    std::io::stdout().write_all(&out).unwrap();

ls will not colorize the output.

Does anyone have any idea on how should we do this?

@hehelego
Copy link
Contributor Author

hehelego commented Sep 29, 2023

Alright, this thread is becoming too long to read. I shall give a quick summary of the current progress:

  • An API misuse is causing all this. terminal_size::terminal_size() queries the terminal size of stdout, stdin, stderr while we only want size of the terminal connected to stdout.
  • We've replaced the calls with terminal size query on stdout only.
  • We want to set up several tests to ensure that eza dose the expected behavior. However we currently have no way to test --color=auto: In any case, we have to somehow capture the output of the spawned eza process, which disables terminal color.

Ultra980
Ultra980 approved these changes Oct 1, 2023
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
`eza` manpage and `README` have been refering to this option as `--colo[u]r`. We should follow the tradition and keep the writing style consistent.

Co-authored-by: MartinFillon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: hehelego <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@cafkafk cafkafk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can't push to your branch for some reason, but I rebased and added a breaking notifiers (! and BREAKING CHANGE:) to the first commit.

commit 9a3b1cbd66a07ae0208b99418db0bb2598303582
Author: hehelego <[email protected]>
Date:   Wed Sep 27 18:05:39 2023 -0500

    fix!: query stdout terminal size to see if the output goes to a tty.
    
    `terminal_size::terminal_size()` is used to determine if stdout is
    connected to a real tty/pty. In previous version of `terminal-size`,
    this method only queries the terminal size for `stdout`.
    However, it is changed in the following commit
    https://github.com/eminence/terminal-size/commit/08f0e73926c11adc3105dbf4eb84dd8c9e6c873a
    Now the method will use `stdout, stdin, stderr`, trying its best to
    determine the terminal size. This cannot be used to determine if `eza`
    output is piped or redirected.
    We should use `terminal_size_using_fd` on `stdout.as_raw_fd` instead.
    
    Resolves #434 Fixes #433
    
    BREAKING CHANGE: This is a change in behaviour from before, and so we
    have marked it as breaking. In practice, it probably won't break
    anything except if you're doing something really weird (more power to you!).

You need to do that, and this should be good to ship today

@cafkafk cafkafk linked an issue Oct 2, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Member

@cafkafk cafkafk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm just gonna fix this after merge, still needs a follow up with tests

@cafkafk cafkafk merged commit 6e9d53f into eza-community:main Oct 2, 2023
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
7 participants