feat: Use BPF iterator instead of procfs #336
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vadorovsky
force-pushed
the
bpf-iterator
branch
from
4d6e4b4 to
acf7493
Compare
vadorovsky
force-pushed
the
cgroup-skb-core-read
branch
from
8dad79c to
87966a5
Compare
vadorovsky
force-pushed
the
bpf-iterator
branch
from
acf7493 to
4e8a25d
Compare
Replace the process tracker initialization process from procfs parsing to BPF iterators, which are less erronous and result in an easier implementation.
vadorovsky
force-pushed
the
bpf-iterator
branch
from
4e8a25d to
cdf890c
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replace the process tracker initialization process from procfs parsing to BPF iterators, which are less erronous and result in an easier implementation.