(hotfix) New exception types

[Carsons-Eels]

What was wrong?

We are missing some specific exception types in master that would be useful to have there before we merge forks/osaka in during release. This set of changes are not identical to the changes in the PR it was cannibalized from, as that included adding those exception types in forks/osaka folders that do not yet exist in master.

Because we want these exception types in master now, but do not want to re-write commit history for the default branch, we are making this PR which adds all of the historical fork exception types without including code for which there is no folder yet.

⚠️ Therefore, this is a temporary addition to master, which will need to be removed before merging forks/osaka back into master during the next release. ⚠️

Related to Issue #1021

Cannibalized from PR #1286

How was it fixed?

Cute Animal Picture

“Glasswing Butterfly” by Andreas Kay, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.00000% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.07%. Comparing base (7c4e616) to head (6d8d584).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/ethereum/byzantium/transactions.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/ethereum/constantinople/transactions.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/ethereum/frontier/transactions.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/ethereum/homestead/transactions.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/ethereum/spurious_dragon/transactions.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/ethereum/tangerine_whistle/transactions.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1342   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.07%   96.07%           
=======================================
  Files         534      534           
  Lines       31319    31324    +5     
  Branches     2711     2711           
=======================================
+ Hits        30090    30095    +5     
  Misses        816      816           
  Partials      413      413           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	96.07% <88.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[souradeep-das]

thanks! the PR description will need an update