Basic implementation of EIP-7932 #1292
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Update to latest EIP-7918 * EIP-7918 t8n tool update --------- Co-authored-by: Sam Wilson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Guruprasad Kamath <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is only here as a proof of concept, I won't open this PR until I am confident that this code will not royally screw up anything, specifically as this completely modifies transaction processing.
This'll also remain a draft until I have finished the tests.
What was wrong?
EIP-7932 support was not implemented.
How was it fixed?
EIP-7932 support was implemented.
Cute Animal Picture