docs: Fix Subject-Verb Agreement in OP Tokenomics Text #1109
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
famouswizard
requested review from
Nicca42,
bradleycamacho,
cpengilly,
krofax,
opjulian and
opmxwell
as code owners
👷 Deploy request for optimism-docs pending review.Visit the deploys page to approve it
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
I noticed a couple of errors in the text that needed a quick fix. Specifically, the sentences "Rewards for the OP economy comes" and "Today, rewards comes directly" were using incorrect subject-verb agreement.
I’ve updated them to:
This ensures the text reads more smoothly and maintains consistency in grammar.