Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support psram for esp32s3 (QEMU-220) #104

Conversation

dongsheng28849455
Copy link

@dongsheng28849455 dongsheng28849455 commented Nov 8, 2024

Support psram for esp32s3
The size is up to 32M, and try to fix the issue #103

Description

Related

Testing

Tested with nuttx/esp32/esp32s3 platform
qemu-system-xtensa -m 32M -semihosting -serial mon:stdio -machine esp32s3 -drive file=nuttx,if=mtd,format=raw -nic user,model=open_eth

NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-12.6.0-RC1
nsh>
nsh>
nsh> free
total used free maxused maxfree nused nfree
Kmem: 378896 23464 355432 23848 355416 31 2
Umem: 32964608 10640 32953968 11024 32953968 9 1
nsh>

Checklist

Before submitting a Pull Request, please ensure the following:

  • 🚨 This PR does not introduce breaking changes.
  • All CI checks (GH Actions) pass.
  • Documentation is updated as needed.
  • Tests are updated or added as necessary.
  • Code is well-commented, especially in complex areas.
  • Git history is clean — commits are squashed to the minimum necessary.

The size is up to 32M
remove redundant log
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title support psram for esp32s3 support psram for esp32s3 (QEMU-220) Nov 8, 2024
@igrr
Copy link
Member

igrr commented Nov 11, 2024

@dongsheng28849455 We've merged PSRAM support for S3 in 39534c3 and 89fe574. Thanks again for the contribution and sorry we didn't use your version.

@igrr igrr closed this Nov 11, 2024
@dongsheng28849455
Copy link
Author

@dongsheng28849455 We've merged PSRAM support for S3 in 39534c3 and 89fe574. Thanks again for the contribution and sorry we didn't use your version.

That's great, thank you!

@espressif-bot espressif-bot added Status: Done Issue is done internally Resolution: Done Issue is done internally and removed Status: To Do labels Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Resolution: Done Issue is done internally Status: Done Issue is done internally
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants