Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated MakeAsyncFunction prop types to accept an ActionMatcher #4

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lutangar
Copy link

Hi @erikras

A few changes on the prop types/flow def/doc to allow an ActionMatcher on resolve and reject props, without raising a warning (as seen in redux-promise-listener 1.1.0)

Keep up the good work!

Cheers.

…eject

Update and reflect changes of redux-promise-listener 1.1.0
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 21, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #4 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master     #4   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files           1      1           
  Lines          15     15           
  Branches        4      4           
=====================================
  Hits           15     15
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/MakeAsyncFunction.js 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5e7821f...9eb63ab. Read the comment docs.

@lutangar
Copy link
Author

I suppose the version number should be bumped to 1.1.0 but I don't know what's your strategy on this. Let me know.

@JalilArfaoui
Copy link

Is there any news on this @erikras ?

@AfrazHussain
Copy link

Any updates on when this will be merged?

@lutangar
Copy link
Author

lutangar commented Feb 4, 2021

It's 2021 and I wonder what's the status on this :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants