Use optimal flags for the embind_val codesize test #24615
Merged
+5
−9
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
brendandahl
approved these changes
Jun 30, 2025
RReverser
force-pushed
the
embind-val-optimal-flags
branch
from
fa40847 to
05670e7
Compare
- `-sDYNAMIC_EXECUTION=0` was no-op since we added it to common flags. - `-fno-rtti` fallback is actually more expensive than the default RTTI-based mode (using actual `typeid(T)`).
RReverser
force-pushed
the
embind-val-optimal-flags
branch
from
05670e7 to
fa9cfce
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
-sDYNAMIC_EXECUTION=0was no-op since we added it to common flags.-fno-rttifallback is actually more expensive than the default RTTI-based mode (using actualtypeid(T)).