Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add hints for failing conditions #172
Add hints for failing conditions #172
Changes from 2 commits
c4965eb
3344ae9
2fafebb
1d29e54
c688cdf
3795a0d
cfb8cdc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As it was
Printf()
before, this is just a sanity check, but it is intentional that it isPrint()
and notPrintln()
yeah?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah sorry had this change lying around for a while, it is supposed to be Print. Printf was kind of like a format string vulnerability lol, not that those exist in go. The newline is added in toPrint via Sprintln.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we have a line or two to explain what
checkOr
andcheckAnd
are designed to do? it is a slightly less direct name than previouslyThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I saw that the functions were identical for checkFails/PassOverride because they were both OR/|| behavior, in that on the first true, return. Whereas pass is AND/&& because everything needs to be true otherwise return false. Sure I'll add a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually good catch I messed that up and forgot to change it to take a list of conds rather than a check