Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Weak lensing shear data #32

Open
wants to merge 446 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Weak lensing shear data #32

wants to merge 446 commits into from

Conversation

sweverett
Copy link
Collaborator

I've started looking into reading in and using weak lensing data with Pangloss. We can use this pull request to track changes in the wl branch.

@sweverett sweverett self-assigned this Jun 23, 2015
@sweverett sweverett added this to the SULI Final Presentation milestone Jun 23, 2015
sweverett and others added 24 commits August 3, 2015 18:00
…lation section of the `compare_corr()` method in `BackgroundCatalog`. #70
… method of `BackgroundCatalog` were using `floats` instead of `ints`. #70
…og` to calculate the percent difference or percent error between two different correlation functions. #70
…os()` to only print if `vb` is set to `True` in `BackgroundCatalog`.
…` that computes the relative importance of each foreground galaxy in a given lightcone from 0 to 1. #66
…ized by the largest importance for each `lightcone`. #66
…ground objects with `importance` greater than the kwarg `importance_lim`, which by default is set to 0.0 (so all galaxies are used). #66
…the method is not making the lensing process noticably faster. #66
…s and definitions to be placed. The first script is called `lens_compare.py` which creates a `BackgroundCatalog`, lenses it by `WLMap`s and halos, and then compares the correlation of each.
…oundCatalog` to correctly calculate the strongly-lensed ellipticity if g>1. However, `lens_by_map()` currently removes all galaxies with a g>0.5. #58
@drphilmarshall
Copy link
Owner

I am amazed that this branch can be merged cleanly. @tcollett @charlottenosam what criteria would you like us to meet before merging all this weak lensing work into the Pangloss master branch? At the moment the basic Pangloss test does not work, because the data is not quite in the right place ( #11 ), but I am worried that when we merge in from the wl branch, it will become difficult/impossible to reproduce your two papers. Thoughts welcome! Are you planning on using the Pangloss code in the near future? Are you using it now?

davidthomas5412 and others added 16 commits October 19, 2016 19:27
….py`, `plotting.py`, and the `lens_compare` test that I used in the final days of finishing my thesis. I must have forgotten one final push - oops! The only major changes were finishing the implementation of the log-likelihood calculation in `background`, pre-calculating the redshift bin volumes (implemented in `grid` and called in `background`) to speed up the smooth-component correction, and a few plotting changes in `plotting` for better plots to use in my thesis. I dont think this should conflict much (or at all) with what David has started to work on. Sorry for any confusion! #73 #101
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants