Add --raw option to search command

[sweharris]

As referenced in issue #230 this adds a --raw to search to dump the raw JSON results of a search.

eg

% rbw search --raw nosuchentry
[]

% rbw search --raw test | jq .
[
  {
    "id": "0315e272-b3d8-4dfa-a418-2b88a8599a96",
    "folder": null,
    "name": "Test",
    "data": {
      "username": "test1",
      "password": "test",
      "totp": null,
      "uris": []
    },
    "fields": [],
    "notes": null,
    "history": []
  },
  {
    "id": "44ef6aae-b088-4fef-a0fa-0ef9586a21f3",
    "folder": null,
    "name": "Test",
    "data": {
      "cardholder_name": "test",
      "number": "12345",
      "brand": null,
      "exp_month": null,
      "exp_year": null,
      "code": null
    },
    "fields": [],
    "notes": null,
    "history": []
  }
]

[doy]

implemented this separately in da48064

[sweharris]

Hmm, your version doesn't seem to display all the fields, just a subset; (id, name, user, folder). The goal behind my --raw option was to dump the whole record so a user could then format it in shell to display whatever they wanted.

% rbw search --raw discord
[
  {
    "id": "2e62d994-4fe7-467a-85a9-7992945f486f",
    "name": "discord - user1",
    "user": "user1@login",
    "folder": "Chat"
  },
  {
    "id": "3d821c06-6f5c-4cfe-a63d-0d7f644c3f23",
    "name": "discord - user2",
    "user": "user2@login",
    "folder": null
  }
]

With this version the user would need to collect all the UUIDs and then do a get --raw on each to get similar data (so a total of 3 calls to rbw in my example, rather than 1).

I'm guessing this is because of ListField::all()

impl ListField {
    fn all() -> Vec<Self> {
        vec![Self::Id, Self::Name, Self::User, Self::Folder]
    }
}

Was this a deliberate choice?

[doy]

which fields are you interested in specifically?

[sweharris]

My current script uses id, name, data.username, data.password, data.uris[].uri, data.totp, notes.

But it just seems to me that search --raw returning an array of the same elements get --raw does is more consistent and "least surprise"

[pschmitt]

My 2cts: I'd like to see all fields in the JSON. The more the better.