Skip to content

Add code coverage for ToolStripProfessionalLowResolutionRenderer #13691

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

Zheng-Li01
Copy link
Member

@Zheng-Li01 Zheng-Li01 commented Jul 9, 2025

Related #13442

Proposed changes:

Add unit test file: ToolStripProfessionalLowResolutionRendererTests.cs for ToolStripProfessionalLowResolutionRenderer.cs file

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

@Zheng-Li01 Zheng-Li01 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 9, 2025 09:02
@Zheng-Li01 Zheng-Li01 added the waiting-review This item is waiting on review by one or more members of team label Jul 9, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.80952%. Comparing base (47b32ab) to head (db7620c).
Report is 28 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##                main      #13691         +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage   76.75977%   76.80952%   +0.04975%     
===================================================
  Files           3256        3258          +2     
  Lines         642016      642393        +377     
  Branches       47548       47564         +16     
===================================================
+ Hits          492810      493419        +609     
+ Misses        145540      145315        -225     
+ Partials        3666        3659          -7     
Flag Coverage Δ
Debug 76.80952% <100.00000%> (+0.04975%) ⬆️
integration 18.98758% <ø> (-0.00383%) ⬇️
production 51.41112% <ø> (+0.08375%) ⬆️
test 97.41740% <100.00000%> (+0.00020%) ⬆️
unit 48.79392% <ø> (+0.08617%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

ricardobossan
ricardobossan previously approved these changes Jul 11, 2025
Copy link
Member

@ricardobossan ricardobossan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All LGTM!

@ricardobossan ricardobossan added the waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author label Jul 11, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed the waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author label Jul 14, 2025
Copy link
Member

@ricardobossan ricardobossan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@ricardobossan ricardobossan merged commit 61e6d09 into dotnet:main Jul 17, 2025
8 checks passed
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed the waiting-review This item is waiting on review by one or more members of team label Jul 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants