-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
551f587
commit 516687f
Showing
8 changed files
with
175 additions
and
10 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ | ||
--- | ||
marp: true | ||
header: 'Literature Review Seminar' | ||
theme: ub-theme | ||
paginate: true | ||
--- | ||
|
||
|
||
# The Literature Review Seminar | ||
|
||
## Presentation of review protocols | ||
|
||
Seminar, Master | ||
|
||
Prof. Dr. Gerit Wagner | ||
Fakultät Wirtschaftsinformatik und Angewandte Informatik | ||
Universität Bamberg | ||
|
||
--- | ||
|
||
# Presentation of review protocols | ||
|
||
1. Student presentation (10-15 min) | ||
2. Questions and discussion (5-10 min) | ||
3. Feedback | ||
|
||
TBD: Schein oder Flexnow? | ||
|
||
<!-- | ||
# Topics | ||
TODO : include a table of students and topics (if ) | ||
## Learning objectives | ||
Acquire a broad understanding of | ||
- the goals and types of literature reviews | ||
- the steps of the process | ||
- the qualities of a good review paper | ||
- the available research software | ||
## Outcome | ||
- A **review protocol** applying this understanding | ||
- The [evaluation criteria and resources for theses apply](https://digital-work-lab.github.io/handbook/docs/teaching/30_processes/30.40.theses.html) (length: approx. 15 pages) | ||
- Submission: January 26, presentation: February 1 | ||
--> |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ | ||
--- | ||
layout: default | ||
title: Review Protocol | ||
has_toc: true | ||
nav_order: 7 | ||
--- | ||
|
||
# Review Protocol | ||
|
||
## Grading criteria | ||
|
||
Length: approx. 15 pages | ||
|
||
Title page information: | ||
|
||
- Topic | ||
- Title | ||
- Abstract (clarity) | ||
- Keywords | ||
|
||
Introduction: | ||
|
||
- Generativity statement | ||
- Clear topic, phenomenon, theory | ||
- Explicit and appropriate rationale | ||
- Clear questions or objectives | ||
- Optional: review type | ||
- Expected contributions | ||
- Clear scope | ||
|
||
Intermediary section (optional; note if it should be included) | ||
|
||
Methods: | ||
|
||
- State type of review (justify if necessary) | ||
- Description of search strategy and procedures (in line with review type) | ||
- Descripiton of screening criteria | ||
- Quality appraisal (if applicable) | ||
- Data extraction procedures explicit and aligned with review type | ||
- Data analysis and synthesis approach described | ||
|
||
Conclusion / Short limitations, implications for research and practice | ||
|
||
Appendix: | ||
|
||
- List of contributors and responsibilities (optional) | ||
- Timetable (mandatory) | ||
- List of tools and purposes (mandatory) | ||
- Intended registration (optional) | ||
- Other declarations (optional) | ||
|
||
## Resources | ||
|
||
Paré, G., Wagner, G., & Prester, J. (2023). How to develop and frame impactful review articles: key recommendations. *Journal of Decision Systems*, 1-17. [link](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197701) |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.