-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Added footprints for pcb-rnd layout editor #17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Neat! Thank you! What do you think about having a separate repo for it? That will make it lighter weight to have as a submodule in another github repo. |
I don't mind. I could host it if need be under my github repo. What naming would you suggest for such a version of the repo? |
I've made: https://github.com/debug-edge/pcb-rnd Happy to have it under the debug-edge org. |
Sounds perfect. Did you want to move them over or do you want me to fork it and do a pull request? |
Please redo the pull request. Thanks!
…On Mon, Nov 30, 2020, at 6:02 PM, erichVK5 wrote:
Sounds perfect. Did you want to move them over or do you want me to fork it and do a pull request?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#17 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAM3KNKEOMS5QYUUGDTT23SSRFDJANCNFSM4UGGDGMA>.
|
hmm, there's a problem with namespace collision of the proposed repo with pcb-rnd the layout editor. Would DebugEdge-for-pcb-rnd or something like that be better? It's a bit like setting up a repo named "KiCad". I have deleted my fork of https://github.com/debug-edge/pcb-rnd |
I think you can rename your fork and it'll work ok. Let me know if you can't. Will it have a footprint and a component? Maybe |
this is a problem you will have to address for multiple layout editors. specification, and then implementations in different formats pcb-rnd supports parametric footprints too, so the repo could end up holding static versions of the footprints, a parametric version, and example layouts. there is already a librnd that contains shared code for the EDA suite. The name should ideally be less generic and relate specifically to the DebugEdge connector. Perhaps DebugEdge-pcb-rnd or DebugEdge-example-pcb-rnd or DebugEdge-4-pcb-rnd might be OK? DebugEdge-example-pcb-rnd would be the most extensible naming convention, allowing DebugEdge-example-Eagle |
Footprints created for the open source layout editor pcb-rnd