-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
updates and tests #23
Conversation
njayp
commented
Oct 24, 2023
- helm install/uninstall action
- general fixes
- test workflow
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
4a36eb6
to
43efc1f
Compare
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
43efc1f
to
b29bdd9
Compare
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
Any news on this one ? :D |
I got it to build. Now i just need to get my tests to pass. I have an odd issue where core isn't propagating my secret |
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
4160704
to
2bf184f
Compare
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
2bf184f
to
e514eba
Compare
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
9ae446c
to
89adf2e
Compare
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
c8cec4b
to
2ad55c1
Compare
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
2ad55c1
to
727a71c
Compare
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
2da9013
to
4dd1418
Compare
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
4dd1418
to
0f367e4
Compare
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does the README is up-to-late with those changes ?
version: "v1.25.3" | ||
id: kubectl | ||
- name: Provision Kubeception cluster | ||
uses: datawire/infra-actions/[email protected] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there a reason not to use the last version ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not really, i just copied from our integration tests w/o checking
- name: Test Intercept with Curl | ||
shell: bash | ||
run: | | ||
sleep 3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we do something better than a sleep ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i dont think so. we could have a retry, but thats basically the same thing 🤷
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: njayp <[email protected]>