-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Schema 4.6 draft #144
Schema 4.6 draft #144
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a great start, @ashwinisukale , but can you also add tests for the new relatedIdentifierType
, contributorType
, relationType
, and dateType
values? See the summary of changes here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RllY4Q-_Ls9gHSfy9Iuwlctv0uV4E_S6Sg56rvkMt1o/edit#heading=h.76dlmbn6ivq4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How does this release play with the stylistic changes that Kelly is doing? Are they being released at the same time?
@KellyStathis I'm not sure I have the most context on this—can you provide some insight? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have added most of the test cases in this file, instead of having multiple files for testing different part of the XML. I will create a issue which will clean all the tests inside schema. Right now they are all having incorrect file path.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. The only one I don't see is 'dateType: Coverage'. That may be elsewhere?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thats was a good catch, adding it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just added all the date types and tested its presence.
spec/kernel-4.6/other_spec.rb
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2nd ResourceTypeGeneral in other_spec.rb should have 'Project' instead of 'Award'?
Sorry @codycooperross and @svogt0511 I missed this last week. The redesign of the schema site is on track to launch at the end of October. Once that's complete, I would merge those changes into this |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think one of the last pieces of this work, assuming that all the new values are tested as valid against the XSD, is to copy all of the spec/kernel-4.6
tests to the spec/kernel-4
folder. These two should be identical, to my memory, because the XSD is identical as well. @svogt0511 does that sound right?
I have created a ticket which will address this #146 here I am also addressing correction of test cases in other versions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As far as I can see my comments have been addressed. I am going to approve this pending resolution of Cody's comments. I assume that this is not going to be released until @KellyStathis is ready to make the announcement of 4.6, and at that time, everything related to 4.6 will be released. I am also assuming that 4.6 is scheduled to go after the October release of the site format/css changes.
# Conflicts: # source/_versions.html.md.erb # source/meta/kernel-4/index.html.md
<date dateType="Available">2024-01-01</date> | ||
</dates> | ||
<descriptions> | ||
<description xml:lang="en" descriptionType="Abstract">This chapter reviews selected landmarks ocurred in Chemistry basic research in the last 5 years</description> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<description xml:lang="en" descriptionType="Abstract">This chapter reviews selected landmarks ocurred in Chemistry basic research in the last 5 years</description> | |
<description xml:lang="en" descriptionType="Abstract">This chapter reviews selected landmarks occurred in Chemistry basic research in the last 5 years</description> |
ref:
Purpose
closes: #141
Approach
Open Questions and Pre-Merge TODOs
Learning
Types of changes
Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
Reviewer, please remember our guidelines: