test(dpp): add test for group with all unilateral members

[shumkov]

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

Add a test

What was done?

Add a test

How Has This Been Tested?

It is a test

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
• I have added "!" to the title and described breaking changes in the corresponding section if my code contains any
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if needed

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

• I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Expanded automated test coverage to ensure enhanced reliability of group validation processes.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request adds a test module within the packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/group/v0/mod.rs file. The module, compiled only during tests, contains a single test function called test_group_with_all_unilateral_members. This test creates a GroupV0 instance with two unilateral members, each given a power of 1, and verifies that the validate method returns a valid result when using the latest platform version.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
packages/rs-dpp/.../group/v0/mod.rs	Added a new test module (annotated with #[cfg(test)]) and a test function test_group_with_all_unilateral_members to validate the validate method of the GroupV0 struct.

Possibly related PRs

• fix: group member power validation #2520: Introduces modifications to the logic within the same validate method, establishing a direct relationship with the new test ensuring the method’s correct behavior.

Suggested reviewers

• QuantumExplorer

Poem

I'm a rabbit of the code,
Hopping through tests with a cheerful mode.
Carrots and code, a joyful blend,
Ensuring GroupV0 will transcend.
With each validation that's run,
I nibble bugs until they're done!
🥕🚀

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/group/v0/mod.rs (1)

166-183: Consider adding a brief docstring to explain the test's purpose.

While the test function name is descriptive, a short docstring would make it even clearer what a "unilateral member" is in this context (a member whose power equals the required power) and why this test case is important.

#[test]
+ /// Verifies that a group with only unilateral members (members with power
+ /// equal to the required power) passes validation successfully.
fn test_group_with_all_unilateral_members() {

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d25e226 and d927e17.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/group/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)

• GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Check each feature
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Tests
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Formatting
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Linting
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive-abci) / Tests
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Unused dependencies
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive-abci) / Unused dependencies
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive-abci) / Linting
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive-abci) / Check each feature
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive) / Linting
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive) / Tests
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (wasm-dpp) / Linting
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (wasm-dpp) / Tests
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Check each feature
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Linting
• GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Tests
• GitHub Check: Build Docker images (Dashmate helper, dashmate-helper, dashmate-helper) / Build Dashmate helper image
• GitHub Check: Build Docker images (Drive, drive, drive-abci) / Build Drive image
• GitHub Check: Build Docker images (DAPI, dapi, dapi) / Build DAPI image
• GitHub Check: Build JS packages / Build JS

🔇 Additional comments (1)

packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/group/v0/mod.rs (1)

159-185: LGTM! Well-structured test module for unilateral members.

The test correctly verifies that a group where all members have exactly the required power (making them unilateral members) passes validation. This is an important edge case to test.