Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update pasta gpg key to reflect new subkeys #6290

Merged

Conversation

PastaPastaPasta
Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta commented Sep 26, 2024

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

I've added 2 subkeys to my GPG key 29590362EC878A81FD3C202B52527BEDABE87984 to better follow best practices, which avoids using your primary key whenever possible. All future git commit signing, and potentially releases will be signed by a subkey instead of the primary key.

These updated subkeys keys are now included on all the major keyservers
hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com
hkps://pgp.mit.edu
hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com

keybase has 1 of the 2 subkeys already, will add the other soon.

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Users who validate my signatures may have to refresh the key from keyservers via gpg --refresh-keys or pull down from keybase via curl https://keybase.io/pasta/pgp_keys.asc | gpg --import

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

@UdjinM6
Copy link

UdjinM6 commented Sep 27, 2024

@PastaPastaPasta
Copy link
Member Author

keys do not match https://keybase.io/pasta/pgp_keys.asc?fingerprint=29590362EC878A81FD3C202B52527BEDABE87984 🤷‍♂️

Imported via keybase:

pub  rsa4096/52527BEDABE87984
     created: 2019-08-14  expires: 2026-08-16  usage: SC  
     trust: unknown       validity: unknown
sub  rsa4096/99F8136674CE12CB
     created: 2019-08-14  expires: 2026-08-16  usage: E   
sub  ed25519/E2F3D7916E722D38
     created: 2024-09-26  expires: 2026-09-26  usage: S   
sub  ed25519/CDDEA7E911316053
     created: 2024-09-26  expires: 2026-09-26  usage: S   
[ unknown] (1). Pasta <[email protected]>
[ unknown] (2)  Pasta (See keybase.io/pasta for proofs on my identify. 60ACF70BF712645049EE6F15EFEAF16686225F64 is my offline only GPG key.)
[ unknown] (3)  Pasta <[email protected]>

imported from this PR

pub  rsa4096/52527BEDABE87984
     created: 2019-08-14  expires: 2026-08-16  usage: SC  
     trust: unknown       validity: unknown
sub  rsa4096/99F8136674CE12CB
     created: 2019-08-14  expires: 2026-08-16  usage: E   
sub  ed25519/E2F3D7916E722D38
     created: 2024-09-26  expires: 2026-09-26  usage: S   
sub  ed25519/CDDEA7E911316053
     created: 2024-09-26  expires: 2026-09-26  usage: S   
[ unknown] (1). Pasta <[email protected]>
[ unknown] (2)  Pasta (See keybase.io/pasta for proofs on my identify. 60ACF70BF712645049EE6F15EFEAF16686225F64 is my offline only GPG key.)
[ unknown] (3)  Pasta <[email protected]>

They appear to match to me based on this? maybe some metadata is in a different order or something? I'm not sure I guess if desired, I could update this one to match the keybase one exactly?

@UdjinM6
Copy link

UdjinM6 commented Sep 27, 2024

keys do not match https://keybase.io/pasta/pgp_keys.asc?fingerprint=29590362EC878A81FD3C202B52527BEDABE87984 🤷‍♂️

...
They appear to match to me based on this? maybe some metadata is in a different order or something? I'm not sure I guess if desired, I could update this one to match the keybase one exactly?

I think ideally they should match exactly. Makes it easier to verify.

Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK c3f2474

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit 4c1e034 into dashpay:develop Oct 3, 2024
7 of 11 checks passed
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta deleted the chore/bump-pasta-key branch October 22, 2024 15:54
PastaPastaPasta added a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
c3f2474 chore: update pasta gpg key to reflect new subkeys (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  I've added 2 subkeys to my GPG key `29590362EC878A81FD3C202B52527BEDABE87984` to better follow best practices, which avoids using your primary key whenever possible. All future git commit signing, and potentially releases will be signed by a subkey instead of the primary key.

  These updated subkeys keys are now included on all the major keyservers
  hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com
  hkps://pgp.mit.edu
  hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com

  keybase has 1 of the 2 subkeys already, will add the other soon.

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes
  Users who validate my signatures may have to refresh the key from keyservers via `gpg --refresh-keys` or pull down from keybase via `curl https://keybase.io/pasta/pgp_keys.asc | gpg --import`

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK c3f2474

Tree-SHA512: 87d33caceb1973a54877c5d5a8b85a48e1373b7709698efc793598bf7453608979bfe1c75e4ea0c9ec852c0343b43b06357c58f6c4fbf72915eb910788cc705f
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 modified the milestones: 22, 21.1.1 Oct 22, 2024
PastaPastaPasta added a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
c3f2474 chore: update pasta gpg key to reflect new subkeys (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  I've added 2 subkeys to my GPG key `29590362EC878A81FD3C202B52527BEDABE87984` to better follow best practices, which avoids using your primary key whenever possible. All future git commit signing, and potentially releases will be signed by a subkey instead of the primary key.

  These updated subkeys keys are now included on all the major keyservers
  hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com
  hkps://pgp.mit.edu
  hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com

  keybase has 1 of the 2 subkeys already, will add the other soon.

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes
  Users who validate my signatures may have to refresh the key from keyservers via `gpg --refresh-keys` or pull down from keybase via `curl https://keybase.io/pasta/pgp_keys.asc | gpg --import`

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK c3f2474

Tree-SHA512: 87d33caceb1973a54877c5d5a8b85a48e1373b7709698efc793598bf7453608979bfe1c75e4ea0c9ec852c0343b43b06357c58f6c4fbf72915eb910788cc705f
PastaPastaPasta added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
d627a6e chore: bump version to 21.1.1 (pasta)
5f9700c docs: release notes for v21.1.1 (pasta)
1c00726 Merge #6277: chore: add builder key for kittywhiskers (pasta)
a2bc0f1 Merge #6290: chore: update pasta gpg key to reflect new subkeys (pasta)
167608c Merge #6338: ci: attest results of guix builds (pasta)
6fb4e49 Merge #6197: ci: always build guix, save artifacts (pasta)
c0ca93c Merge #6340: fix: make 6336 compile in v21.1.x branch, using older CHECK_NONFATAL functionality (pasta)
bb96df4 Merge #6336: fix: rpc getblock and getblockstats for blocks with withdrawal transactions (asset unlock) (pasta)
8e70262 Merge #6131: feat: make a support of Qt app to show Platform transfer Tx (pasta)
80ed279 Merge #6328: backport: bitcoin#30131, bitcoin#23258, bitcoin#30504 - fix bild for Ubuntu 24.10 + clang (pasta)
bd772fb Merge #6229: fix: `creditOutputs` in AssetLock tx json output should be an array of objects, not debug strings (pasta)
9bf39a9 Merge #6222: fix: adjust payee predictions after mn_rr activation, add tests (pasta)
87bebfc Merge #6219: fix: correct is_snapshot_cs in VerifyDB (pasta)
a4e6b8a Merge #6208: fix: persist coinjoin denoms options from gui over restarts (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  See commits, backports, release notes, version bump

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  knst:
    utACK d627a6e
  kwvg:
    ACK d627a6e
  UdjinM6:
    utACK d627a6e
  ogabrielides:
    utACK d627a6e

Tree-SHA512: cde7e40760e16e9f48da8149c3742d18a34029b057405e4d55b87110da96acbcd19b47280451dd7b5ad1ccfc91fde655452cf5f0f0d1e01a41b4c685337c64b8
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants