feat(map): Handle json.Number when merging maps #261
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
If you unmarshall a json object using the json.Decoder and the UseNumber function, it will create numbers on the map as a `json.Number` object. This object has helper functions for handling ints and floats. So if a json.Number is encountered, try to handle the type of the number based on the destination.
|
Thanks @elliotcourant. I'll give it a thought. |
|
Thank you I really appreciate it! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If you unmarshall a json object using the json.Decoder and the UseNumber function, it will create numbers on the map as a
json.Numberobject. This object has helper functions for handling ints and floats. So if a json.Number is encountered, try to handle the type of the number based on the destination.This partially addresses #138 even though it is an old issue.
If this is not something you'd like to have built in that's totally fine, I'm happy to fork or try to build a transformer for this. But figured a PR would be best since others have asked for it in a way and this seemed like a correct way to do it.