-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[components] Update docs commenting logic #27162
Merged
OwenKephart
merged 1 commit into
master
from
01-15-_components_update_docs_commenting_logic
Jan 23, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ class SampleSubSchema(ComponentSchemaBaseModel): | |
|
||
|
||
class SampleSchema(ComponentSchemaBaseModel): | ||
sub_scoped: Annotated[SampleSubSchema, ResolvableFieldInfo(additional_scope={"outer_scope"})] | ||
sub_scoped: Annotated[SampleSubSchema, ResolvableFieldInfo(required_scope={"outer_scope"})] | ||
sub_optional: SampleSubSchema | ||
sub_list: Sequence[SampleSubSchema] | ||
|
||
|
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ def test_generate_sample_yaml(): | |
|
||
params: | ||
sub_scoped: # Available scope: {'outer_scope'} | ||
str_field: '...' | ||
int_field: 0 | ||
str_field: '...' # Available scope: {'outer_scope'} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. it was actually a bug that these comments weren't showing up before in terms of desired behavior, the previous output might actually have been nicer but now it's much easier to choose which way we want this to appear |
||
int_field: 0 # Available scope: {'outer_scope'} | ||
sub_optional: | ||
str_field: '...' | ||
int_field: 0 | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There appears to be a bug in the path traversal logic. The current code extracts
valpath[0]
before slicing off the first element with_, *rest = valpath
, which means the same element is processed twice. Moving the_, *rest = valpath
line before theel = valpath[0]
check and usingel = first
would fix this issue and ensure correct path traversal.Example fix:
Spotted by Graphite Reviewer
Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.