Skip to content

Conversation

Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Emilgardis Emilgardis force-pushed the improve-build-docker-image branch from ac2b783 to 989e06b Compare March 3, 2025 20:38
@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

/ci try --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

This comment has been minimized.

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

damn, it doesn't spin up the action with the version in this pr :/

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Try run for comment

Failed Jobs

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

Closing this in favor of #1636

@Emilgardis Emilgardis closed this Apr 4, 2025
@Emilgardis Emilgardis deleted the improve-build-docker-image branch April 4, 2025 21:04
@reneleonhardt
Copy link
Contributor

reneleonhardt commented May 21, 2025

@Emilgardis can you restore your branch so I can cherry-pick your improvements on top of 1636?
I don't know why GitHub doesn't allow to download a patch file when the rich diff is still being displayed... 🤷

@Emilgardis Emilgardis restored the improve-build-docker-image branch May 21, 2025 16:03
@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

restored

@reneleonhardt
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks! Is everything needed?
I have to squash everything, but Commit 2 is doubt this works, very WIP 😅

reneleonhardt pushed a commit to reneleonhardt/slint-cross that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks! Is everything needed? I have to squash everything, but Commit 2 is doubt this works, very WIP 😅

No everything is not needed!

@reneleonhardt
Copy link
Contributor

reneleonhardt commented May 22, 2025

So how can I know what's needed and what's not?
It would be easier if this branch would only contain improvements to the target branch.

Why don't you target the other pull request yourself like I did for you?
Then you can prepare everything which would be of value for your contributor.

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

I made this PR to experiment mostly, it was only a draft. The intent was to enable multi-platform building using docker buildx bake but I didn't get that far.

@reneleonhardt
Copy link
Contributor

Ok. And what does it mean? Should your improvements be integrated here or do you want to refine them later?

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member Author

Emilgardis commented May 23, 2025

I don't know what you mean, improvements are good, and they should always be refined. But there's nothing in this specific pr that absolutely has to be included.

@reneleonhardt
Copy link
Contributor

I just tried to help because the contributor said it would be too hard to apply your improvements.
Now your branch could be applied with one click, it's not my decision to actually do it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants