Skip to content

[Snyk] Upgrade qs from 6.15.2 to 6.15.3#237

Open
mblack-contentstack wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-upgrade-ae909b2873aa97d6c5f8b946f958bea4
Open

[Snyk] Upgrade qs from 6.15.2 to 6.15.3#237
mblack-contentstack wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-upgrade-ae909b2873aa97d6c5f8b946f958bea4

Conversation

@mblack-contentstack

Copy link
Copy Markdown

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade qs from 6.15.2 to 6.15.3.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released 21 days ago.

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: Low

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.

Release notes
Package name: qs from qs GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

@mblack-contentstack

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Merge Risk: Low

This is a patch version upgrade for qs from 6.15.2 to 6.15.3.

According to the changelog, this version includes several fixes and robustness improvements. Key changes include:

  • More consistent enforcement of limits like arrayLimit and throwOnLimitExceeded.
  • Fixes for handling character encoding and avoiding the use of __proto__.
  • A performance improvement for the compact utility function.

These changes are intended to fix bugs and make the library more robust and performant. No breaking changes are documented.

Source: qs CHANGELOG.md

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

@mblack-contentstack
mblack-contentstack requested a review from a team as a code owner July 16, 2026 04:36
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage report

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟢 Statements 99.2% 247/249
🟢 Branches 96.55% 140/145
🟢 Functions 100% 35/35
🟢 Lines 99.14% 230/232

Test suite run success

145 tests passing in 7 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 44a8c1c

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage report

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟢 Statements 99.2% 247/249
🟢 Branches 96.55% 140/145
🟢 Functions 100% 35/35
🟢 Lines 99.14% 230/232

Test suite run success

145 tests passing in 7 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 44a8c1c

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants