Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump conda-smithy selector to Python 3.12 #180

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Since this will be encountered again during the next Python migration, just bump the Python version in the downstream test selector. This way that migration can go through smoothly and we can bump once conda-smithy is installable with the next Python version.


Checklist

  • Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
  • Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
  • Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

Since this will be encountered again during the next Python migration,
just bump the Python version in the downstream test selector. This way
that migration can go through smoothly and we can bump once conda-smithy
is installable with the next Python version.
@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@jakirkham jakirkham mentioned this pull request Nov 4, 2022
@isuruf
Copy link
Member

isuruf commented Nov 4, 2022

This selector should not be necessary once mamba-org/boa@45e1752 is in a release.

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

It is in boa version 0.13.0. Should we include this as a lower bound somewhere?

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed the conflict. Though this won't work until conda-smithy is rebuilt with Python 3.12 or the fix Isuru alluded to above (or an equivalent fix) is available

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants