-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
Add IsRestrictQualifiedType
& GetNonRestrictQualifiedType
functions
#579
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Vipul-Cariappa
wants to merge
2
commits into
compiler-research:main
Choose a base branch
from
Vipul-Cariappa:dev/restrict-type
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -610,3 +610,22 @@ TEST(TypeReflectionTest, IsFunctionPointerType) { | |||||
EXPECT_FALSE( | ||||||
Cpp::IsFunctionPointerType(Cpp::GetVariableType(Cpp::GetNamed("i")))); | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
TEST(TypeReflectionTest, RestrictQualifiedType) { | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. warning: function 'TEST' can be made static or moved into an anonymous namespace to enforce internal linkage [misc-use-internal-linkage]
Suggested change
|
||||||
Cpp::CreateInterpreter(); | ||||||
Cpp::Declare(R"( | ||||||
int *x; | ||||||
int *__restrict y; | ||||||
)"); | ||||||
|
||||||
Cpp::TCppType_t x = Cpp::GetVariableType(Cpp::GetNamed("x")); | ||||||
Cpp::TCppType_t y = Cpp::GetVariableType(Cpp::GetNamed("y")); | ||||||
|
||||||
EXPECT_FALSE(Cpp::IsRestrictType(x)); | ||||||
EXPECT_TRUE(Cpp::IsRestrictType(y)); | ||||||
|
||||||
EXPECT_EQ(Cpp::GetCanonicalType(Cpp::GetNonRestrictType(y)), | ||||||
Cpp::GetCanonicalType(x)); | ||||||
EXPECT_EQ(Cpp::GetCanonicalType(Cpp::GetNonRestrictType(x)), | ||||||
Cpp::GetCanonicalType(x)); | ||||||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we make codecov happy here?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need a generic interface for the cvr types. Something like:
bool HasTypeQualifier(Quals::Restrict & Quals::Const & Quals::Volatile) { ... }
bool StripTypeQualifier(...) { ... return true;/if something was really stripped/}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. That can be done.
The
enum
can be simplyxor
ed to combine different qualifiers.@vgvassilev, Is this approach good?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, makes sense. The enum should be const, volatile, restrict to follow the CVR terminology.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Look at #594