⚡️ Speed up function pad_image_with_background_color by 99%#54
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Open
⚡️ Speed up function pad_image_with_background_color by 99%#54codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
pad_image_with_background_color by 99%#54codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
The optimized code achieves a **98% speedup** (52.2ms → 26.3ms) through two key optimizations: ## What Changed 1. **Zero-padding fast path**: When `pad == 0`, the code now returns `image.copy()` instead of creating a new blank image and pasting the original onto it. 2. **PIL's `ImageOps.expand` for actual padding**: Replaced manual `Image.new()` + `paste()` with `ImageOps.expand()`, which is a specialized PIL function optimized for border expansion. ## Why It's Faster **For zero-padding cases** (2 test cases show 100-135% speedup): - Original: Created a same-sized blank image + pasted the original → unnecessary allocation and paste operation - Optimized: Direct `copy()` → single efficient operation **For actual padding cases** (most test cases show 1-19% slower for small images, but 103-147% faster for large images): - `ImageOps.expand()` is implemented in C and optimized for border creation, reducing Python overhead - The line profiler shows the expand operation takes 99.4% of function time but completes faster overall for realistic workloads - For small images (≤100x100), the overhead of calling `ImageOps.expand` slightly outweighs benefits - For large images (≥1000x1000), the optimization shines: **2.79ms → 1.38ms** (103% faster) and **13.8ms → 5.58ms** (147% faster) ## Impact on Workloads Based on `function_references`, this function is called in a **hot path** within `get_structure()` for table detection, which: - Processes images with `pad_for_structure_detection` (likely non-zero in production) - Uses feature extraction on padded images, making this a per-image overhead - Benefits significantly if processing large document images (common in table extraction) The optimization particularly helps when: - Processing large images (800x800+): **up to 147% faster** - Handling zero-padding edge cases: **100-135% faster** - Running table structure detection at scale (the calling context suggests batch processing) Small overhead on tiny test images (10-19% slower for <100px images) is negligible compared to gains on production-sized images.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 99% (0.99x) speedup for
pad_image_with_background_colorinunstructured_inference/utils.py⏱️ Runtime :
52.2 milliseconds→26.3 milliseconds(best of56runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 98% speedup (52.2ms → 26.3ms) through two key optimizations:
What Changed
Zero-padding fast path: When
pad == 0, the code now returnsimage.copy()instead of creating a new blank image and pasting the original onto it.PIL's
ImageOps.expandfor actual padding: Replaced manualImage.new()+paste()withImageOps.expand(), which is a specialized PIL function optimized for border expansion.Why It's Faster
For zero-padding cases (2 test cases show 100-135% speedup):
copy()→ single efficient operationFor actual padding cases (most test cases show 1-19% slower for small images, but 103-147% faster for large images):
ImageOps.expand()is implemented in C and optimized for border creation, reducing Python overheadImageOps.expandslightly outweighs benefitsImpact on Workloads
Based on
function_references, this function is called in a hot path withinget_structure()for table detection, which:pad_for_structure_detection(likely non-zero in production)The optimization particularly helps when:
Small overhead on tiny test images (10-19% slower for <100px images) is negligible compared to gains on production-sized images.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pad_image_with_background_color-mkox1v5nand push.