⚡️ Speed up function merge_setting
by 61%
#29
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 61% (0.61x) speedup for
merge_setting
insrc/requests/sessions.py
⏱️ Runtime :
1.39 millisecond
→867 microseconds
(best of603
runs)📝 Explanation and details
To optimize the given Python program, let's focus on enhancing the
merge_setting
andto_key_val_list
functions. We want to make the code more efficient by reducing unnecessary operations and making better use of Python's built-in functions. Here are the optimized versions of the functions.Key Changes and Improvements.
Simplified
merge_setting
.request_setting
to updatemerged_setting
, which avoids creating an intermediate list.pop
method to remove keys that are set toNone
, which is more efficient and Pythonic than first collecting keys and then deleting them in a separate loop.merged_setting
fromsession_setting
usingdict_class
, which simplifies the code.Minor improvements in
to_key_val_list
.Mapping
to items and then into a list, we directly convert to a list in one step.This rewritten code should accomplish the same tasks as the original code but in a more efficient manner.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
📢 Feedback on this optimization?