-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
disable non-security dependabot PRs #49
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #49 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.53% 98.53%
=======================================
Files 22 22
Lines 6776 6776
=======================================
Hits 6677 6677
Misses 99 99
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would recommend all three approaches together.
EDIT: also moved to weekly
8 open dependabot PRs felt like a bit of a nuisance. i'd like to do one of three things to rein it in, each having pros and cons:
winnow
right now) you can't merge the rest of theminput welcome