Skip to content

Fix typo in vulnerability policy instructions#368

Open
michaelajsc wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
michaelajsc-patch-1
Open

Fix typo in vulnerability policy instructions#368
michaelajsc wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
michaelajsc-patch-1

Conversation

@michaelajsc
Copy link

Teeny change of 'requets' to 'requests'.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 12, 2026 10:12
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 12, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
cloudsmith-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 12, 2026 10:13am

Request Review

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Fixes a typo in the “Block Until Scan” documentation so the vulnerability policy example correctly references the requests Python package.

Changes:

  • Correct requetsrequests in the vulnerability policy example text.
  • Adjust indentation/whitespace in a couple of lines (which may affect Markdown rendering).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

Browse to your Workspace Settings and [create a new vulnerability policy](/policy-management/vulnerability-policy). Define your policy with:
- A name.
- A [package Search Query](/artifact-management/search-filter-sort-packages) to scope the filter to `format:python AND requests`. We're targeting only packages named `requets` from Python, following the example in the next step. Adjust the policy to affect only to your desired scope if you use a different package for this example.
- A [package Search Query](/artifact-management/search-filter-sort-packages) to scope the filter to `format:python AND requests`. We're targeting only packages named `requests` from Python, following the example in the next step. Adjust the policy to affect only to your desired scope if you use a different package for this example.
Copy link

Copilot AI Mar 12, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The phrase "Adjust the policy to affect only to your desired scope" is ungrammatical and a bit hard to parse. Consider rewording to something like "Adjust the policy to apply only to your desired scope" (or similar).

Suggested change
- A [package Search Query](/artifact-management/search-filter-sort-packages) to scope the filter to `format:python AND requests`. We're targeting only packages named `requests` from Python, following the example in the next step. Adjust the policy to affect only to your desired scope if you use a different package for this example.
- A [package Search Query](/artifact-management/search-filter-sort-packages) to scope the filter to `format:python AND requests`. We're targeting only packages named `requests` from Python, following the example in the next step. Adjust the policy so that it applies only to your desired scope if you use a different package for this example.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
- **Reduced Risk**: checking packages before running them reduces your exposure to non-compliant software.

In short, Block Until Scan is a crucial tool for securing and reducing risk in your software supply chain. No newline at end of file
In short, Block Until Scan is a crucial tool for securing and reducing risk in your software supply chain.
Copy link

Copilot AI Mar 12, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PR description says this is only a typo fix, but this diff also changes indentation/whitespace (e.g., this line is no longer indented). Since that can change Markdown rendering, it would be good to mention the formatting adjustment explicitly in the PR description (or revert it if unintentional).

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants