-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FAQ: NGINX Ingress Controller for routing #415
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
osterman
changed the title
FAG: NGINX Ingress Controller for routing
FAQ: NGINX Ingress Controller for routing
Mar 23, 2019
osterman
reviewed
Mar 23, 2019
|
||
## Question | ||
|
||
Is the NGINX Ingress Controller needed for internal routing? I’d like more info on how that is meant to be used. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
Is the NGINX Ingress Controller needed for internal routing? I’d like more info on how that is meant to be used. | |
Is the NGINX Ingress Controller needed for internal routing? |
osterman
reviewed
Mar 23, 2019
|
||
On GKE, deploying an NGINX Ingress Controller is not required, as GKE ties in directly with GCP load balancers. On AWS, the NGINX Ingress Controller is currently (2018) the de facto standard on AWS. However, there are up and coming contenders. | ||
|
||
That said, the NGINX Ingress Controller is not uncommon in GKE as well. It operates in tandem with the platform-provided load balancer to route traffic within the cluster. The benefits of using the NGINX Ingress Controller is that you get all the features of NGINX (e.g. lua). The downside is that for very large clusters running thousands of pods, the Community Edition (CE) ingress reloads might be disruptive (which is why there's an enterprise offering by NGINX that supports real-time updates). A cluster can run multiple NGINX Ingress Controller deployments—even one per namespace. This can get expensive though, since each NGINX Ingress Controller ships with its own load balancer. An ingress resource then uses an annotation to select an ingress controller. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
That said, the NGINX Ingress Controller is not uncommon in GKE as well. It operates in tandem with the platform-provided load balancer to route traffic within the cluster. The benefits of using the NGINX Ingress Controller is that you get all the features of NGINX (e.g. lua). The downside is that for very large clusters running thousands of pods, the Community Edition (CE) ingress reloads might be disruptive (which is why there's an enterprise offering by NGINX that supports real-time updates). A cluster can run multiple NGINX Ingress Controller deployments—even one per namespace. This can get expensive though, since each NGINX Ingress Controller ships with its own load balancer. An ingress resource then uses an annotation to select an ingress controller. | |
That said, the NGINX Ingress Controller is not uncommon in GKE as well. It operates in tandem with the platform-provided load balancer to route traffic within the cluster. The benefits of using the NGINX Ingress Controller is that you get all the features of NGINX (e.g. lua). The downside is that for very large clusters running thousands of pods, the Community Edition (CE) ingress reloads might be disruptive (which is why there's an enterprise offering by NGINX that supports real-time updates). A cluster can run multiple Ingress Controller deployments—even one per namespace. This can get expensive though, since each NGINX Ingress Controller ships with its own load balancer. An ingress resource then uses an annotation to select an ingress controller. |
osterman
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
what
why
Links to #353