Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FAQ: Use kubectl with RBAC to FAQ #385

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

FAQ: Use kubectl with RBAC to FAQ #385

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

drnickiw
Copy link
Contributor

what

  • Use kubectl with RBAC FAQ

why

  • Imported from Google Doc

Links to #353

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
---
title: "Can we use kubectl with RBAC?"
description: "Recent releases of Kubernetes support custom authentication providers."
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
description: "Recent releases of Kubernetes support custom authentication providers."
description: "Yes, recent releases of Kubernetes support custom authentication providers including support for AWS IAM."

@drnickiw drnickiw changed the title add use kubectl with RBAC to FAQ FAQ: Use kubectl with RBAC to FAQ Feb 17, 2019
Copy link
Member

@osterman osterman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

always use lower-case filenames ( not use-kubectl-with-RBAC.md)

@osterman osterman mentioned this pull request Feb 19, 2019
@drnickiw
Copy link
Contributor Author

let me know if there is an issue with this one. for some reason, i'm thinking there may be, but unsure.

@osterman
Copy link
Member

Closing for now. Both our kops and eks implementations support RBAC.

@osterman osterman closed this Jan 13, 2020
@osterman osterman deleted the kubectl-RBAC branch January 13, 2020 01:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants