Skip to content

Many changes #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Many changes #5

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Oct 15, 2015

  • Added a reference to scss-lint on syntax.
  • Fixed a typo. (And probably introduced many others).
  • Specified how to use spaces in HTML and CSS.
  • Fixed a typo about using integers or decimals.
  • Non-decorative images are always content.
  • One should never embed images or anything in HTML. There are more drawbacks than benefits on it.

  - Added a reference to scss-lint on syntax.
  - Fixed a typo. (And probably introduced many others).
  - Specified how to use spaces in HTML and CSS.
  - Fixed a typo about using integers or decimals.
  - Non-decorative images are always content.
  - One should never embed images or anything in HTML. There are more drawbacks than benefits on it.
@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ Always strive for specificity over brevity. The more specific our class selector

### Syntax

We use the SCSS flavor of SASS to preprocess our CSS.
We use the SCSS flavor of SASS to preprocess our CSS. You might want to use [scss-lint](https://github.com/brigade/scss-lint) with the configuration provided in this repository.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@spicymagpie Depending on platform, https://github.com/sasstools/sass-lint is usually a better choice since it supports Sass & SCSS syntax and leverages LibSass which is signifcantly much faster accordingly.

Accordingly, it's often seen as a better choice, but there's nothing wrong with naming both—with it likely being the first one listed instead of this one or a Ruby Sass - LibSass distinction.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @lozandier, thanks for the suggestion! Frankly, I don't even know if this PR is still valid for what has been done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant