Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make wording in note more precise #209

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2025
Merged

Conversation

jsf9k
Copy link
Member

@jsf9k jsf9k commented Jan 15, 2025

🗣 Description

This pull request improves the wording in a note to make it more precise.

💭 Motivation and context

The new wording better conveys the intent of the note.

🧪 Testing

All automated tests pass.

✅ Pre-approval checklist

  • This PR has an informative and human-readable title.
  • Changes are limited to a single goal - eschew scope creep!
  • All relevant type-of-change labels have been added.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • These code changes follow cisagov code standards.
  • All new and existing tests pass.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
The new wording better conveys the intent of the note.
@jsf9k jsf9k added documentation This issue or pull request improves or adds to documentation kraken 🐙 This pull request is ready to merge during the next Lineage Kraken release labels Jan 15, 2025
@mcdonnnj mcdonnnj added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit e42ea25 Feb 7, 2025
17 checks passed
@mcdonnnj mcdonnnj deleted the documentation/improve-wording branch February 7, 2025 19:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation This issue or pull request improves or adds to documentation kraken 🐙 This pull request is ready to merge during the next Lineage Kraken release
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants