Address various deprecation warnings. #40
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… modern equivalents
…le) to use Bytes instead
…same behavior with previous versions of OCaml, while fixing compilation failure on 4.06
…vior with previous versions of OCaml, while fixing compilation failure on 4.06
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As of OCaml 4.02:
To the latter point, the changes to Pretty and Errormsg are only necessary for compilation in 4.06; behavior should be the same in previous versions.
As of OCaml 4.03:
I have confirmed compilation in 4.03, 4.04, and 4.06.0+trunk (with other changes to fix the Num module movement problem, a different PR) on Darwin. I have run "make test", and the same tests fail before and after the changes (which really should be semantics-preserving).